13 Comments

Astroturf movement = fake/engineered grassroots movement!

Expand full comment

Astroturfing as a concept only really applies to niche stuff. The idea of astroturfing a massive political campaign for the presidency by one of the two major parties is a little silly.

Expand full comment

Exactly; the term is meant to criticize a social movement for being presented as the authentic will of the Average Joe rising up, as opposed to the reality that it is corporate mandated.

The term is used in medicine to denote "patient advocacy" groups that pharmaceutical companies fund to increase demand for their products. One of the reasons I'm not in chronic pain advocacy is that it is (or was twenty years ago) a very astroturfed domain where a lot of the major groups existed to provide cover for what of course was ultimately discovered to be the massive overutilization of opioids.

One could call some aspects of the trans phenomenon, or the woke social justice world in general astroturfed.

Expand full comment

basically i'm never gonna be first again

Expand full comment

lol. It appears your reign of firsts is over.

Expand full comment

I'm all for policies that make it easier to have children, but on the evidence of basically all of Europe, that does not do anything to increase birth rates.

The Pew result is quite strange. I'm not sure I would have worded a poll that had a bunch of specific reasons and then this cop-out generic "I just don't want them" answer. And the generic answer won comfortably. And it just seems to contradict the most basic laws of nature that humans apparently lack a desire to reproduce. It demands more of an explanation than "meh".

Expand full comment

The best academic piece I could find on the subject of women afraid of being pregnant was this: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5766978/

It's out of date though, since it actually uses the word "women".

Apparently "tokophobia" is more common that I at least might have anticipated and varies by country (ranging from 6-14% in this study). Apparently some countries are more aggressive about pursuing it as a mental health issue but it is not a large part of the conversation in the U.S.

Expand full comment

I've seen four theories about JD Vance.

1. He's idealistic and basically sympathetic. Evidence: His remarks to and about his wife and "Sopes".

2. He's opportunistic. Evidence: his book exploited its subjects and didn't make up for that by having interesting things to say.

3. He's damaged. Evidence: his own account of his childhood, and his history of shifting attachments.

4. He represents an up-from-your-bootstraps conservative tradition. Evidence: the attitude toward his book's subjects - it's good they vote Republican, but they need to help themselves - and cat ladies.

I vote all of the above. If Sarah Haider and Mickey Kaus (and, I guess, Ross Douthat, but maybe he's just gullible) see something sympathetic in him, it's probably there. But in 2016 when he was promoting his book in interviews, I thought, what's the big deal? there's nothing there. If someone had told me at the time he was going to run for Senate, I would have thought, oh, that explains it, this book is his Dreams From My Father.

-- Childless Cat Man

Expand full comment

Guy who was thinking about having kids and then remembered how much he hates JD Vance

Expand full comment

90 minutes of pure hilarity. I just can't stop laughing.

Expand full comment

First cat on the scene

Expand full comment

Someone takes your private messages and releases them to put out an ideologically charged hit on you that's ultimately ineffective? Wow, that's relatable.

Being stabbed in the back still sucks though, even if the person doing it is using a butter knife.

Expand full comment

Maybe Sarah and Megan are victims of the “mean girls”? Andrew Klavan had a really good take on what is going on in left wing politics on his recent podcast…

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-andrew-klavan-show/id1045171376?i=1000664191380

Expand full comment